Maintain Consulting & Audit

Maintain Consulting & AuditMaintain Consulting & AuditMaintain Consulting & Audit

Maintain Consulting & Audit

Maintain Consulting & AuditMaintain Consulting & AuditMaintain Consulting & Audit
  • Home
  • Services
    • Services
    • Strategy & Architecture
    • Project Delivery
    • Application Support
  • Audits
  • 3 Stage Method
    • Early Stage|Hazard Map
    • Mid stage|Course Correct
    • Late stage|Project Rescue
  • How Do We Work
    • How do we work?
    • Free Consult
    • Diagnostic
    • Consulting Project
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • More
    • Home
    • Services
      • Services
      • Strategy & Architecture
      • Project Delivery
      • Application Support
    • Audits
    • 3 Stage Method
      • Early Stage|Hazard Map
      • Mid stage|Course Correct
      • Late stage|Project Rescue
    • How Do We Work
      • How do we work?
      • Free Consult
      • Diagnostic
      • Consulting Project
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Careers

  • Home
  • Services
    • Services
    • Strategy & Architecture
    • Project Delivery
    • Application Support
  • Audits
  • 3 Stage Method
    • Early Stage|Hazard Map
    • Mid stage|Course Correct
    • Late stage|Project Rescue
  • How Do We Work
    • How do we work?
    • Free Consult
    • Diagnostic
    • Consulting Project
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Careers

Mid stage: course correction

Problems such as high volumes of: system defects, project change requests, data migration errors, resource burnout and stress, resources working overtime, poor test execution are recognised mid-project cause impact to delivery. These problems can be counter-measured may include resetting project expectations and outcomes, aligning on deliverable scope, improvement project team communications, resetting vision, resource management. The introduction of structured assurance regimes significantly  increase the likelihood of a timely quality delivery.  

Quality Assurance: Design | Build | Test

Our Design | Build | Test quality assurance techniques ensure that technology solutions are designed and developed to meet the desired objectives, requirements, and quality standards. It involves various activities and methodologies aimed at verifying and validating the design risks, enhance performance, and ensure successful implementation via test acceptance

Schedule

Problem: A number of project schedule reforests lead to delay after delay.


Outcome: Re-baseline schedule with deliverability quotient managed to deliver to revised schedule


Process: 'Project Schedule and Deliverability Assurance Assesment'

Quality

Problem: No quality assurance regime, resulting in solutions going live with bugs


Outcome: Significant reduction in Build and Test defects, relieving the pressure of go live critical path, improving quality outcomes and customer satisfaction


Process: Implementation of 'Design, Build, Test Quality Assure method'

Cost

Problem: The data team on a major ERP program was logging large overtime hours, without showing results.


Outcome: 75% reduction of billed hours and reallocation of work assignment resulting in higher eNPS and cNPS


Process: 'Time and Motion Study with Capability assessment'

scope

Problem: This project commenced with poorly defined scope leading to disagreements of solution design


Outcome: This project required strategic pause, to define and align on scope. Project phase 1 went live with defined scope and clear pathway to deploy


Process: Implementation of ''Scope Assurance method'

Case Study: SAP Solution Delivery Assurance & Optimisation

Problem: Poor quality and cost control leading to highly ineffective project delivery


Outcome: Reduction in cycle time by 50%. Improvement in Quality outcomes (less defects), eNPS uplift (focusing on the right things), ability to Quantify value and burn rate 


Process: Implement 'Solution Delivery Assurance method'

Case Study: Software Fit for Purpose Assessment

Problem: Software vendor proposed a 10x cost increase 


Outcome: Assessment of investment and TCO resulted in termination of incumbent software vendor.  Path to assess alternate new technology options was developed

Process: Implementation of 'Fit for Purpose method'

want to know more?

Request a copy of our BUSINESS PROFILE here

#

free consult

#

diagnostic

Course Correction

#

consulting project

Project Rescue

Copyright © 2025 Maintain: Technology Project Assurance & Rescue - All Rights Reserved.

  • Strategy & Architecture
  • Project Delivery
  • Application Support
  • Early Stage|Hazard Map
  • Mid stage|Course Correct
  • Late stage|Project Rescue

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept